Blog / Entries / 16

The Manipe F1 Blog

Tue, 16 March, 2010Is this F1's worst crisis?

Given the unjustified outcry by fans, journalists, teams and even drivers at the lack of overtaking in Sunday's Bahrain Grand Prix, it's surprising that it has not yet been branded F1's worst crisis. Perhaps the fact that it comes hot on the heels of crashgate, spygate and many more gates besides, the F1 fraternity are become much-accustomed to the strange fortunes of our beloved sport.

But is the lack of overtaking in Bahrain really as much of a crisis as those inside and outside F1 are making out to be? While being far from the sport's worst crisis, it is simply a result of the core values of Formula One and the current set of regulations that overtaking is being made so difficult in the modern era.

The ongoing push for ever-increasing downforce levels by the sport's engineers has rendered it nearly impossible for cars to follow each other closely in corners due to the turbulent air, therefore making overtaking nearly impossible on the straights. Neither changing the refuelling ban, introducing mandatory pitstops nor altering tyre performance are going to make huge strides towards rectifying the issue.

Instead Formula One needs to take another serious look at car design. But as the 2008-2009 regulations overhaul showed, no matter how much the regulations intend to cut downforce and therefore increase the chance of overtaking, engineers will always find a way back and create downforce where downforce simply didn't exist the year previous.

It may therefore be wise to re-examine the idea of introducing a downforce limit on cars, which could in turn offer engineers more freedom in the way they create downforce. The idea was first mooted by then FIA president Max Mosley in 2005, but was abandoned in favour of the car design changes introduced last year. Now though, with downforce levels as high as they have ever been, F1 needs to find alternative means of reducing grip. A downforce limit would do this, and also continue to encourage engineering innovation, something which will always be needed to keep Formula One as the pinnacle of motorsport.

In the meantime, perhaps the F1 fraternity should reduce the volume and sit out the forthcoming races in Australia, Malaysia and China before consigning the current season of F1 to the scrapheap. With no KERS, this year's races were always going to be duller than 2009, but the championship battle between the sport's big 4 should be just as thrilling to watch.

  • Michael Schumacher (DEU) Mercedes W01 and Fernando Alonso (ESP) Ferrari F10. 2010 Bahrain Grand Prix, Rd 1, Qualifying day. Sakhir, Bahrain. Saturday 13 March 2010. © Mercedes.
  • Vitaly Petrov (RUS) Renault R30. 2010 Bahrain Grand Prix, Rd 1, Qualifying day. Sakhir, Bahrain. Saturday 13 March 2010. © Renault.
  • Jarno Trulli (ITA) Lotus-Cosworth T127. 2010 Bahrain Grand Prix, Rd 1, Qualifying day. Sakhir, Bahrain. Saturday 13 March 2010. © Lotus.
NewsNow.co.uk
« Previous postPrint postNext post »

Comments

  • Posted by JohnsonsEvilTwin on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 at 19:21 (Reply)

    Manipe

    I totally agree. But what can we do? The FIA doesnt appear to want to listen and Bridgestone will not create a softer tyre that degrades quicker. Its a right pickle, I reckon that geezer called Schumi and his peers should make a public show of unity in FORCING changes on the sport I(we) love.
    I fear for F1 this year as Im a hardened fan yet even I struggled to watch the pathetic "show" of bahrain.

  • Posted by Z33 on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 at 20:22 (Reply)

    Perhaps because of a long and unpleasant winter I'm excited about this year's contest, Bahrain notwithstanding. I love the present quali format and was enjoying Vettel's commanding performance before the Red Bull broke. But it is fundamentally silly to have any racing series develop to the point where engineers prohibit the competitive driving of a car and I fear that's where we've come. I think a mandate for single element wings of a more conservative size are called for at the very least with a possible ban on wings in general. Let the aero people massage the fuselage for their downforce while the car creates a largely placid wake behind it. It would completely bring the drivers back into the game. I have a poster of Jim Clark pounding around a corner at Zandvoort in his Lotus. I do not have a poster of Adrian Newey on my wall.

  • Posted by joeymac on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 at 22:17 (Reply)

    I'd like to know if Bernie's people read these comments, because there is so much fan feedback to be gained from these blog's and their comments.

    For my 2 cents I'd like to add that I believe that F1's main problem is these tight, twisty tracks. The cars are long & cumbersome, especially this year, so overtaking between tight turns is impossible.

    F1 needs innovation and should have the most beneficial aerodynamics, including ground effect. It's the tracks that should be the target. I dare say that the collective spend would be cheaper, compared to all these 'pro-overtaking' regulation changes.

  • Posted by Ixwa on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 at 23:21 (Reply)

    Ban all wings and diffusers!

  • Posted by v8578 on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 at 22:51 (Reply)

    This is not F1's worst crisis-that would be if Bernie took over everything and introduced his "snakes & ladders" rules (shortcuts etc) among many other idiotic things he would do...

    Possible rule changes to make the racing better (in my opinion) should be:
    1. Ban double diffusers (which is happening anyway).
    2. Set a maximum angle of attack for front and rear wings.
    3. Re-introduce re-fuelling to lighten the cars and allow passing in pits.
    4. Re-introduce V-10s or turbos (or any engine more powerful) to make the cars produce more wheelspin etc, making them harder to handle.
    5. Make cars more "clean air-friendly" (if possible) by forcing teams to re-design cars in such a way that less "dirty air" is produced off the back of the car.
    6. Reduce the amount of settings that can be adjusted in-car via the steering wheel - if you've got a bad set-up, just deal with it!
    7. Tell Hermann (Tilke) to go "jump in the lake" and get a better designer who makes tracks that suit F1 more (the only good track he's designed is Turkey and they're getting rid of it!). I could make better tracks than Hermann...

    If this doesn't work, then:
    1. Ban diffusers all together; have a completely flat underside.
    2. Remove adjustable front wing flaps.
    3. Re-introduce KERS (although I personally don't like it as it is artificial overtaking).
    4. Give more frontal grip, promoting oversteer.

    There's probably a lot more things that could be done to fix the lack of overtaking and make the races more exciting; this was just what I could think of off the top of my head.

  • Posted by Woodcat on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 at 20:59 (Reply)

    Why hasn't F1 incorporated the same aero package as is used in GP2? They have air tunnels that seems to allow a following car to deal with the turbulance of the leading car, and therefore allows easier passing to take place....
    Barring that, I said before the 2010 rules were published that I think F1 should go "back in time" and reintroduce the same regs as they had in the 70's and 80's. Nice big fat sticky tires, undercar ground effects, and single plane wings, and perhaps the wings could be sensor actuated to allow for changes in attitude and angle without driver input. Do away with these fancy rear diffusers that seem to be causing so much following turbulance, and yes, I'd be in favor of bringing back V10 and V12 engines as well.

  • Posted by Manipe on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 at 18:21 (Reply)

    @6: Put bluntly Woodcat, the second F1 starts introducing spec aero packages is the day F1 dies. Some would say that introducing spec tyres is even going against the true grain of Formula One as an innovating formula.

    Engine development is (supposed to be) stopped, so the only area of develop on the car remains the aerodynamics. Take that away and Formula One becomes just another motor-racing series without any distinguishing characteristics.

  • Posted by XR8 on Wed, 5 May 2010 at 05:55 (Reply)

    Let the teams develop their engines, but to be more frugal and greener. Introduce E10 or E20 fuel. Even higher if possible.
    You are right Woodcat, re-introduce real racing cars, and real gearboxes, normal steering wheels that do not have the means of altering the cars performance on track.
    D away with radio contact, go back to pit boards.
    Let the drivers be drivers, not programmable steerers.
    Get rid of the old git Ecclestone and put in someone who cares about the marque and not his hip pocket nerve.
    Bring the spectator back into motor sport, not corporate motor racing.

  • Post a reply
    • Nickname (required)
    • E-mail (required, will not be published)
    • Allowed BBcode: [b][/b], [u][/u], [i][/i], [url=][/url], [url][/url]