|
Q: Why does Formula One need cost capping? Two main philosophies have emerged, either i) reduce activity levels through very restrictive technical rules, plus a degree of standardization if required; or ii) restrict the money that teams are allowed to spend (cost capping). The FIA believes that unfettered technical competition is part of Formula One's DNA, and would like to see this flourish, but in an environment of strong, responsible and innovative management, not a spending race. For these reasons cost capping is preferred. Q: What is covered by the cost cap? Drivers and young driver programmes – Formula One is the pinnacle of motor racing. Fundamental to this is attracting the world's best drivers. Moreover we wish to encourage continued investment in young driver programmes. Engine costs – In order to attract manufacturer owned teams to take up the cost capping option, the FIA have decided to exclude engine costs for 2010 (only) Furthermore, we are allowing manufacturers to honor existing supply arrangements, provided there is no element of subsidy that could have a cartel-like affect on the engine market. Q: How did the FIA arrive at the £40m figure? We know what the FOM (Formula One Management) revenue is likely to be in the future, and we have some understanding of realistic sponsorship revenues during the recession. Taken together, it's possible to project total external revenues for all finishing positions in the Championship. At £40m we believe that 70 per cent of the grid can generate a profit. This transforms the business case for owning a Formula One team, for both manufacturers and private investors. The desired net result is to have a very healthy commercial environment for present and new owners. We also had a good look at costs, and believe that £40m in combination with greater technical freedom will allow engineers to create Formula One cars even more interesting and exciting than today's cars. Q: Will the £40m cap for 2010 be changed for future years? Q: How does the FIA intend to police the cost cap? The Regulations allow for the establishment of a Costs Commission to monitor and assist teams in complying with the Regulations. The Costs Commission will appoint auditors, and other financial experts as required, in order to do this. A key factor is that all cost capped teams are businesses engaged in exactly the same activities and this enables consistent interpretation of the principles of the regulations. It is difficult to hide engineering activity or to falsify accounts consistently, given the traceability of transactions in today's world and the access and inspection powers which the Costs Commission will have. The penalties for defrauding the FIA with regard to any willful transgression of any Regulation or any subversion of an investigation are well established. Q: Is a Costs Commission really needed? Q: Who pays for the Costs Commission, auditors and other experts, and doesn't this just add costs, rather than removing them? Q: What is the penalty if a team exceeds the cost cap? Q: What measures are there to prevent teams spending money this year on a car that will compete under cost cap in 2010? Q: How will you stop manufacturer backed teams from running hidden F1-related projects in their parent companies? No team would wish to be exposed as cheating, so we expect a healthy amount of self-policing. However, the rules are clear on this point, such activities must be declared and appropriately valued. Bear in mind the access that the costs commission and auditors have and their ability to compare reported costs across all cost capped teams. Q: Will teams be allowed to buy parts from other teams/manufacturers? Q: How many teams do you expect to take up the budget option? Q: If a team decides not to become cost capped now, can it do so at a later date? Q: Are you worried that F1 will effectively become a two-tier championship? | |||
| |||